A Bill To Strengthen Patient Safety In Clinical Trials

In a bid to strengthen standards for clinical trials, four Congressional Democrats have introduced a bill they contend would close loopholes that allow study results to go unreported. Known as Trial and Experimental Studies Transparency Act, the legislation would require that all foreign clinical studies meet the same requirements as domestic trials if they are used to support an application for marketing in the United States. The idea is to update ClinicalTrials.gov.

One loophole cited, for instance, means that results in registered trials are not reported, which may place future trial participants at risk if another drugmaker chooses to develop the same drug, but lacks safety data from the previous study. They note that 80 percent of the drugs that entered the US market in 2008 were clinically tested overseas, but many trials were not required to be registered with ClinicalTrials.gov.

"Unreported results and missing registrations leave participants, doctors and researchers vulnerable. Significant strides have been made since we established this registry (ClinicalTrials.gov) in 2007, and the TEST Act will create additional certainty regarding registration and reporting requirements and promote transparency in clinical trials," says Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat who introduced the bill, in a statement.

The move comes after several scandals revealed that clinical trial data for various drugs was not fully disclosed and only became known after litigation or studies, such as meta-analyses, were published in medical journals. Examples included the Vioxx painkiller and the Avandia diabetes pill. The issue has consequently plagued the pharmaceutical industry and, at times, undermined its ability to maintain needed trust with physicians and patients.

"This bill would strengthen enforcement of important mechanisms to improve patient and consumer safety. Not only would all clinical trials be required to report their data regardless of FDA approval, it would allow for analysis of the safety as well as efficacy of drugs and devices," says Illinois Democrat Jan Schakowsky. "Increasing transparency while clarifying the registration and reporting requirements will maintain the Clinical Trial Registry Data Bank as a trusted resource” (here is the proposed legislation).

Whether the bill stands a chance of passage is unclear. There are no Republican sponsors and the pharmaceutical industry has been reluctant to support measures that require disclosure of additional data, especially if there is an argument to be made about data that can be considered proprietary. Nonetheless, patient safety resonates more so than ever in the wake of the various scandals and drugmakers may find themselves on the defensive by opposing disclosure.

10 Comments

Aug 3, 2012 - 9:14am
Congressional staff groupies should spend less time making the DC night scene and drinking cosmos and spend some quality time doing their homework. There is already a detailed FDA Guidance documen in place covering everything you ever wanted to know about accaptability of foreign trial data as well as ethical principles governing them.

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FDA-2004-N-0061-0002;oldLink=false

Regulations and legislation notwithstanding, Chapter 1, "The Guinea Pigs," in Carl Elliott's 2010 book, "White Coat, Black Hat: Adventures on the Dark Side of Medicine," presents a dreary portrayal of clinical trials.
Aug 3, 2012 - 2:06pm
does anyone know how often those foreign trials (and their ethics) are actually audited or checked out? we have a lot of regs, but what is happening in the field, on the ground? Is there a list of foreign docs/research companies to be avoided?
Aug 4, 2012 - 12:49pm
very interesting look at the medical industry http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/11/lies-damned-lies-and-medical-science/8269/#
Aug 5, 2012 - 2:55pm
Wondering how useful people have found the current clinicaltrials.gov
Aug 6, 2012 - 6:49am
I use CT.gov all the time, and generally one can trace the detailed progress of pretty much any drug in development using it. I always find Phase I safety, Phase II proof of concept and dose ranging, and the pivotal phase III trials there as well for pretty much any drug I look at. The data is not usually there for either academic or industry trials, but that is equally true for US and foreign based trials.

I'm having a hard time understanding the relationship of this bill to Vioxx and Avandia. My understanding is that the CV risk of each was established using meta analyses of published data.

Sounds to me like a solution in search of a problem.

Aug 6, 2012 - 11:13am
In one month, I will be having a partial knee replacement; this is a direct result of participating in the aborted clinical trials of tanezumab. I am an RN with a Master's Degree--I asked questions and did my research prior to signing up for the study. I'm not sure which is worse--the damage I sustained despite my best efforts to gather information or the opposition to any strengthening of laws protecting test subjects.
Aug 9, 2012 - 2:00pm
Jacquie, I'm sorry you're going through this. But clinical trials are always a risk - there is no way to have a 100% safe clinical trial, because there's no such thing as a 100% safe drug, and drugs will of course affect different people in different ways. That's the whole point of doing the trials in the first place. In participating, you always take a risk that your condition will be made worse by the study drug, or that you will be given a placebo. I don't know much about tanezumab, but my understanding is that the number of people with severe side effects (requiring joint replacement) was very low, and overall effectiveness and safety was good.
Aug 9, 2012 - 7:39pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanezumab

cut and pasted from the article, "Another phase III trial for hip pain in OA [3] was halted in June 2010 when some patients needed hip replacement.[4]"

@Jen - "...and drugs will of course affect different people in different ways...."

Or maybe the mechanism of action is not understood - in this case why would a medication for pain end up with a hip replacement side effect?

But overall, a nice tight generic response that we can all copy and paste and use over and over again just by dropping in the name of wha'ever drug. Cool.

Aug 11, 2012 - 8:16am
@Vince - good article, thanks for posting. Only when teams are put together who pay no attention to $$$$ when sorting out the science will there be progress.

As is, we are truly going backwards, and worse, now and that's just sad....