Bristol Drops Hep C Drug After Patient Death

You could see this coming. Last night, Bristol-Myers Squibb abandoned an experimental hepatitis C compound after one patient died of heart failure and nine others were hospitalized during a Phase II study. The move comes less than a month after the drugmaker suspended the trial due to safety issues among patients and that decision, not surprisingly, immediately raised questions about the future of the medication (

back story).

The discontinuation is a huge disappointment for Bristol-Myers Squibb, which earlier this year agreed to pay $2.5 billion in cash for Inhibitex and its experimental compound, a nucelotide polymerase inhibitor that was renamed BMS-986094. The wisdom of that deal drew considerable skepticism, though, because the small drugmaker had completed only Phase I testing up to that point.

Although expensive, Bristol-Myers maintained that its rationale was sound, because hepatitis C is increasingly seen by Wall Street as the next huge market for new treatments. And since Bristol-Myers was also developing another compound, the deal would presumably offer a chance to become a big player in a growing field, especially since Gilead Sciences had recently paid a whopping $11 billion for Pharmasset, another small player. Now, Bristol-Myers will take a $1.8 billion charge, according to a filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

"In the interest of all patients participating in hepatitis C clinical studies, and in cooperation with the FDA, we will make relevant information on BMS-986094 available to inform the development of other investigational compounds to treat hepatitis," says Elliott Sigal, a Bristol-Myers exec vp and chief scientific officer, in a statement. The drugmaker noted that two patients remain hospitalized. The causes were not "definitely established," but involve heart and kidney toxicity.

The race to develop hepatitis C treatments is a hot area as several drugmakers seek to gain approval of a new generation of medicines for treating an estimated 170 million patients worldwide. Among others that may benefit from the Bristol-Myers setback are Gilead, Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Achillion Pharmaceuticals. The market is variously estimated at $20 billion for new pills that can work faster, but yield fewer side effects for patients with the liver infection.

As we noted earlier this month, this is only the latest disappointment for Bristol-Myers, by the way. Last month, the FDA again delayed appproval for the Eliquis bloodthinner, which is being jointly developed with Pfizer (read here), and a similar delay is hampering the dapagliflozin diabetes drug that is being developed with AstraZeneca (back story).

12 Comments

Aug 24, 2012 - 8:52am
Perhaps if BMS had used their financial analyst equivalent of Hirbe Powers, Extreme Rep Trainer in valuing Inhibitex, they would not be out $2.5 billion.

Let's hope the hospitalized patients recover.

Aug 24, 2012 - 12:28pm
I wonder who was moron at the top who made the decision to buy the inhibitor (hep C) for a whopping $ 2.5B? BMS had been through this path before in that similar mistakes have been made in the past. Recall that it purchased DuPont-Merck Pharmaceutical (for $ 7.2B?)for nothing and then it decided not to my the Erbitex (from Imclone), before Lilly brought for $6.0 billino or so. I wonder if the people at the top at BMS are qualified enough to make right judgement call.
Aug 24, 2012 - 1:37pm
Hindsight is 20/20. If the drug turned out to be a blockbuster then a couple billion would have seemed a bargain.
Aug 24, 2012 - 1:44pm
@oii - you don't buy after Phase I data. Duh.
Aug 24, 2012 - 3:56pm
I agree that these compounds are overvalued. The problem is that if the drug were offered after a positive phase II trial the asking price would have been considerably higher, with still no guarantee of phase III success.

You and I have done the BD&L thing. We both know this whole thing is a crapshoot, and that the demand for promising early phase compounds by acquiring companies far exceeds the supply. Sometimes they don't even wait until end of phase one as long as you haven't wiped out the animal population with your investigational drug first.

Aug 24, 2012 - 6:00pm
I'd agree with OII. If BMS had bought Pharmasset at the end of Phase I instead of waiting and buying Inhibitex, they could have picked up a multibillion dollar/year market for about $1B.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing.

Aug 24, 2012 - 6:16pm
I still say Hirbe's accounting brother would have figured it out.

"If you want it, take it. If you excuse it, you lose it." - H. Powers

Aug 24, 2012 - 6:18pm
Greedy bet, Gents.

Licensing and co-developmet....you'll never know if sticking with the part called "making a better mouse trap" until you actually have one won't give you what you want....

Aug 24, 2012 - 7:36pm
Hate to be this cynical, but any guesses on how many layoffs will ensure because of this debacle? So far, the "string of pearls" strategy has been more "miss" than "hit".
Aug 25, 2012 - 6:35am
After this, I wonder how long it will be before BMS buys another experimental Hep C compound?

I hope that the remaining patients who suffered complications recover, but worry that if they live, they will get stuck with the bills. Maybe BMS should start and donate money to a victims fund to help pay for their immediate and long term needs.

Aug 25, 2012 - 7:16am
WTH, if you're talking sales force probably not many layoffs. The sales force to sell this drug probably wouldn't have been hired until Phase III. Even then it would probably be contract reps in today's climate.
Sep 4, 2012 - 5:26am
I am one of the patients that was in the study. I had to stop after 7 weeks due to bad depression and the heart and breathing problems it caused. At times it feels like my heart is struggling as well as getting exhausted after doing anything physical, I also had a skin rash for a few months after I stopped the drug. I am now wondering what type of permanent damage it has done and if they are going to be able to walk away without having to pay for the damage their drug might have caused because it was a clinical trial.