FDA Delays New Pfizer Rheumatoid Arthritis Pill

Ian Read warned this would happen. The FDA has delayed approval of tofacitinib, a rheumatoid arthritis pill that some Wall Streeters have been betting will become a blockbuster seller. The agency has delayed approval until at least November 21 while additional data that was recently submitted by Pfizer is reviewed. Although the drugmaker was not asked to provide additional studies, the review constitutes a "major amendment" to the approval application.

The drug would be the first in a class of medications known as JAK inhibitors and data has indicated the pill would offer similar efficacy to such widely used injectables that, collectively, generate some $13 billion in annual sales for treating rheumatoid arthritis. Tofacitinib would also be the first new oral disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, or DMARD, for treating the affliction in more than a decade.

PFE Chart

PFE data by YCharts

This past May, an FDA advisory committee voted 8-2 to recommend agency approval, but late last month, Pfizer ceo Ian Read told analysts that a delay in approval was likely. He also disclosed that tofacitinib met its primary goals in a late-stage clinical trial that compared the pill with methotrexate, but noted this study was not part of the approval application.

9 Comments

Aug 21, 2012 - 10:18am
Ed, given the impressive inverse correlation between Pfizer R&D spend and share price I would say that it's pretty much time to padlock the labs and let the marketing gurus run the company, which they basically do anyway.
Aug 22, 2012 - 12:05pm
@oii - you still have the issue of turning the Queen Mary around in a canal - all the devices and reagents and methods and software "inwestments" for theoretical research turned out to be useless for those useless scientists - now what?
Aug 22, 2012 - 12:26pm
You could do an asset sale, ie buy up all those reagents, chromatographs and scientists and start your own company. Probably to a better job at it than Pfizer.
Aug 22, 2012 - 12:43pm
@oii - with Bill at JPM, good luck with getting funding....

If it's a big "Nyet!" to better baby shampoos and baby wipes for the IDEA of unemployed over 50 mothers and grandmothers with 20 years experience and boomerang unemployed college kid at home with massive student loan debt,

imagine the superhuman channeling of thinking involved in preparing a request for a Chase loan where you have to argue how many angels are there dancing on the pinhead of a "derivative" with the self-proclaimed smartest people on the planet?

Think no one tried to get the contract for sewing the Olympic costumes in NJ...?

Aug 22, 2012 - 2:33pm
It was good enough for me. But today ask a boomerang kid to get out of his parents basement and get a job in a lab cleaning rodent cages, well that simply can't be done if it lowers self esteem and detours them from "living their dreams", which their parents solemnly promised when they were in utero.
Aug 22, 2012 - 2:36pm
@oii - scientists were just following their orders - especially if they had a work visa:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/22/matt-taibbi-wall-street_n_1821166.html

Aug 22, 2012 - 6:39pm
@oii - C'mon the job wasn't just cleaning out the cages...just like changing the kid's diaper isn't the only thing SOME parents do.
Aug 22, 2012 - 8:01pm
That is correct. As a graduate assistant I also had to wash test tubes, mow the department chairman's lawn, get coffee for the lab manager, and always remember to polish up the handle on the big front door. For all that I received a $300/month stipend.

You must be kidding. Before these boomerang millennial Gen Y self absorbed losers can learn to change a diaper they will have to learn to change their own. Maybe tough whe mommy is still doing junior's laundry when he is 36 years old.

I polished up the handle so carefully that now I am the ruler of the Queen's Navy, so that I can turn that QM around in a bathtub.

Aug 22, 2012 - 8:08pm
I agree with the Huffpo piece. In fact, hedge fund antd institutional managers did worse than doing nothing at all. If you just stuck with a plain vanilla index fund you would have beaten these guys soundly.

It's like the old WSJ weekly piece "pros vs darts, where the experts didn't do much better than the monkeys throwing darts:

http://www.automaticfinances.com/monkey-stock-picking/