Hello, everyone, and how are you today? Once again, a shiny sun is hovering over the Pharmalot corporate campus where, surprisingly, things are rather quiet this morning. However, we have a very long to-do list that will keep us busy all day. So to fortify ourselves, yes, we are brewing that mandatory cup of stimulation. But we also plan to take a midday constitutional (otherwise known as a stroll) to recharge. Hope you get to do the same. Meanwhile, here are some tidbits to get you going. Have a successful day and do stay in touch...
FDA May Take More Time To Review Pfizer's Tofacitinib (Dow Jones)
Hospira Resumes Production At Key Plant (Reuters)
Former Teva CEO Was Victim Of 'Medical Negligence' (Israel HaYom)
Icahn Gets Support For Two Forest Board Nominees (Pharma Times)
Price Of Life-Saving Allergy Meds Has Spiked (Reuters)
Bayer Guilty Of Breaching ABPI Codes (InPharma)
Dr. Reddy's Reopens Mexico Plant (InPharma Technologist)
Shire Calms Investor Jitters About Rival ADHD Drugs (Reuters)
Holzyme Stock Sinks After FDA Seeks More Data (Pharma Times)
Natco Fights Bristol-Myers Over Patent In India (Times of India)
Michigan Bill Would Remove Pharma Immunity From Lawsuits (WABC)
Clinical Trial Drug Contributed To Man's Death (New Zealand Herald)
EDITOR'S NOTE: Please check this post for updates during the day
tea kettle thx to mirahartford on flickr






7 Comments
In the current political environment, there is essentially zero chance that our law would be rescinded. Some of us who have been involved in the issue for a decade or longer are working on new language that would at least open up a small window for civil justice.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/pakistans-supreme-court-strikes-down-law-aimed-at-protecting-premier-from-contempt-charge/2012/08/03/6723cabc-dd5f-11e1-8ad1-909913931f71_story.html
You wrote, "MI does’t give “some” immunity from lawsuits over FDA-approved drugs, it gives total, without exception protection."
This immunity "act" is NOT something that even fits the very definition of law. First, it is merciless. Then it is absolutist.
It's a psychotic "act", not a LAW..
That might be a little too "fair", ethically speaking....won't happen if it's "fair"...