Should Congress Probe FDA Over Generic Lipitor?

A year ago, the FDA ended months of anticipation by granting Ranbaxy Laboratories approval to make a generic version of the Lipitor cholesterol pill, despite concerns the generic drugmaker was up to the task given its track record of manufacturing problems. The agency banned 30 Ranbaxy drugs from entering the US and was privy to an expected consent decree issued a few weeks later because Ranbaxy had falsified data (back stories here and here).

For these reasons, the approval was considered questionable and amounted to a gamble. And this week, it would appear the agency lost. Ranbaxy (NSE) has halted production of generic Lipitor after glass particles were found in more than three dozen lots spanning three different doses, although not the highest 80mg dosage (read more here). No safety issues or adverse events have so far been reported, but the move opens the door to a round of second guessing.

This raises prospect, in fact, of a congressional probe, as Michael McCaughan of Prevision Policy points out in The RPM Report. He plays connect-the-dots by noting that the newly named chair of the House Energy & Commerce Oversight Subcommittee is Tim Murphy, a fifth term Republican whose Pittsburgh area district that includes Mylan corporate headquarters (see this).

As we have reported previously, Mylan unsuccessfully filed a lawsuit against the FDA in hopes of forcing the agency to approve its own application to market a generic version of the Lipitor pill. Mylan had argued that the so-called 'first to file' right held by Ranbaxy should have been negated due to the extensive manufacturing problems. However, a federal judge ruled that Mylan did not have standing and bounced the case (see this).

However, McCaughan notes that Murphy was an original sponsor of the Generic Drug User Fee legislation, which was a "compromise forged largely by Mylan and, not surprisingly, he shares Mylan’s view that the new program is as much about assuring a level playing field between US and overseas manufacturers as it is about the speed of generic drug reviews."

So far, the FDA has indicated that a shortage of generic Lipitor is "not anticipated," but the agency is "proactively monitoring the situation for the possibility of a shortage” and working with other manufacturers “to ensure adequate market supply in order to avoid shortages.” This may be an invitation to not only pick up work on legislation on drug shortages, McCaughan adds, but also a chance to probe the FDA.

Of course, there may well have been valid legal considerations that prompted the FDA to allow Ranbaxy to make and market generic Lipitor. The pill is not being made in the facilities that ultimately were cited in the consent decree issued this past January, although Ranbaxy has refused to discuss the source of the troubled product. Nonetheless, this latest episode raises questions about the extent to which the feds bargained hard enough if the integrity of the supply chain and patient safety were paramount goals. What do you think?

[poll id="260"]

11 Comments

Nov 30, 2012 - 11:27am
Not really, I think they should probe the generic industry.

To some extent, I believe these problems are the result of Congress' actions who directed through legislation to make it easier to get generics approved without any tests for capabilities to produce sufficient quantities.

The unintended consequence of a fairly liberal generic policy is that the generic companies may simply not be able to produce hundreds or thousands of different products on a reliable basis.

Nov 30, 2012 - 12:56pm
At this point, I'm not sure that FDA is the relevant agency. What would be of potential interest is the entire paper trail, some of which obviously went through FDA, but I assume a lot of which is within Ranbaxy itself (if not already well shredded).

It remains amazing to me that they would blow an opportunity this big. Shareholder suits seems also to be relevant to anticipate, and discovery in that context might uncover whatever is relevant.

Shifting focus to FDA could well be a "convenient" distraction at this point, as is often the case when focus is shifted there.

Nov 30, 2012 - 12:58pm
As we well know, Mylan has also had "issues."
Nov 30, 2012 - 2:30pm
..... c'mon ED... my colleague Michael hardly knows what he is writing about. Speculation on this and that. Where are the bodies? Shortages???? there are only 100 makers of a statin drug. Congress has bigger fish to fry.
Nov 30, 2012 - 2:48pm
Could Congress possibly deal with the eternal fiscal black hole first?
Nov 30, 2012 - 3:33pm
RBD: if there are bodies, I am sure that Ed knows who and where they are.

Doesn't Mylan has bi-partisan support?

Nov 30, 2012 - 4:10pm
@Justice in MI - if those documents were shredded, then the place can be closed down. You can't shred those documents.
Nov 30, 2012 - 8:15pm
I am shocked by the recall but not at all surprised.

Ranbaxy has been a crappy company for as long as as they have been around.

FDA probably just wanted revenge against Pfizer for being so successful, so they let a half-assed company like ranbaxy get exclusivity. The FDA probably would have let ANYONE make lipitor!! (this is twisted FDA logic, I assure you)

The lipids team at the FDA needs to be investigated. I wouldnt be a bit surprised if there was some back-door bribe that occurred with administration

Unless the penalty bar is raised nothing is going to change. Admitting guilt or closing manufacturing is just saying Oops and we would not do it again. That is not good enough anymore.
Dec 2, 2012 - 10:15am
This seems to be academic. The 180 exclusivity clock on ANDA for ranbaxy expired on May 11, 2012. Mylan launched the generic on May 29, 2012, at leAst per their website.
Jan 22, 2013 - 10:20am
I would like to know why the FDA is withholding information on Ranbaxy's valsartan production. I called the FDA last year to find out why Diovan/HCT was being manufactured in generic form by Mylan and Novartis. Ranbaxy for some unexplained reason was not manufacturing straight valsartan. Of course no response from the person at the FDA, protect the culprit and deny information to a person that might be a potential user of their generic form. I am fed up, been on Diovan for years, no problems. Will be starting the generic of Losartan next week. As far as I am concerned the FDA is full of bureaucratic morons protecting the drug industry and not the people it should be watching out for. IMHO