What Will FDA Tell Amarin About Its Fish Oil Pill?

Today may be a turning point in one of the more captivating stock stories to unfold in the pharmaceutical industry this year. Why? The FDA may finally issue a decision on whether to grant new molecular entity status to Vascepa, a fish oil pill sold by Amarin and which was approved last July by the agency to treat people with very high levels of triglycerides.

In this instance, NCE status can mean the difference between three and roughly five years of patent protection for Vascepa. Given that its primary competition is Lovaza, which is marketed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and generates about $1 billion in annual sales, a favorable ruling by the FDA can mean a huge difference in potential revenue for Amarin.

This has had investors on edge for the past six months, causing Amarin (AMRN) shares to ride the proverbial rollercoaster as the biotech, which is captained by one of the same people who was involved in bringing Lovaza to market many years ago and is struggling to devise a workable long-term strategy. And NCE status makes Amarin much more digestable bait for a big pharma partner.

Whether the FDA will act today is not certain, but Amarin execs previously indicated that a decision may be issued today, when the agency updates its monthly compendium of patent listings known as the Orange Book. Given that Vascepa was approved in July, the delay is unusual and forced Amarin to secure $100 million in financing to hire sales reps and do its own launch.

The premise behind all this activity is the notion that fish oil will continue to be seen as a useful tool in combating high cholesterol and triglycerides, although some skepticism has been raised recently (see this). For instance, Citigroup analysts wrote in a recent report that Vascepa sales could reach nearly $1 billion by 2017.

"The US and global prevalence of elevated blood triglycerides (a type of fat) and cholesterol is very high, and growing steadily," they wrote. "In the US population alone, 33 percent of adults (or about 75 million people) have triglycerides above 150mg/dL, which is the maximum normal level according to guidelines. Less than 5 percent of those with elevated triglycerides are currently being treated with a prescription medication to lower triglycerides."

In other words, there is room for growth, even though Lovaza is already on the market. However, Vascepa has a key advantage over Lovaza, which can raise LDL, or so-called bad cholesterol. For instance, the analysts point to the Lovaza label, which shows the drug causes a 49 percent increase in LDL, while Vascepa showed a decline of nearly 18 percent.

Another key point: Vascepa contains purified ethyl EPA, an omega-3 fatty acid, but does not contain significant amounts of the docosahexaenoic acid, or DHA, another omega-3 fatty acid that is a major component of non-prescription fish-oil pills, as well as Lovaza. And this presumably explains why Vescapa does not raise LDL.

Even though Lovaza generics are due on the market by 2015, the theory is that Vascepa will prove to be superior and able to fend off low-cost competition. Meanwhile, a study two years ago found that combining statins with other drugs that lower triglycerides - fenofibrates such as TriCor - can raise cardiovascular risks (see this).

This is at the crux of the argument offered by Amarin believers - Vascepa is the first triglyceride drug that does not appear to degrade the beneficial effects of statins, which is a shortcoming of other drugs such as Lovaza, fenofibrates and niacin. If the clinical effect of combining Vascepa and a statin proves beneficial to cardiovascular outcomes, then a big pharma that inks a deal with - or simply acquires - Amarin, has a blockbuster on its hands.

Also worth noting: Lovaza is only approved for adult patients with very high triglycerides, or more than 500 mg/dL, which is just 2 percent of the US market. Amarin is expected shortly to submit a study for approval to treat adults with lower levels - between 200 and 500 mg/dL - and high cholesterol, which would add another 15 percent of the population, the analysts note. For the moment, most Wall Streeters believe an approval could come in late 2013 or early 2014.

21 Comments

Dec 14, 2012 - 1:27pm
You can buy non-prescription fish oil for a tiny fraction of the price of prescription fish oil. It's the EPA/DHA quantity you want to look for.
Dec 14, 2012 - 3:44pm
Apparently one billion dollars disagrees with you. Low barrier to entry and with porkers eating their way into hypertrigs a new drug will expand the market more than compete for existing business.
Dec 14, 2012 - 5:36pm
Unless you have sky high TGs (and relevant pancreatic risk) there is, as I understand it, no evidence that lowering has a benefit, at least cardio.

As far as porkers, there are a great many very thin and active people with type 4 hypertrigeridemia who could road race any one of us, and generally do.

Dec 14, 2012 - 9:32pm
uh, no richard.

you need to re-examine your data source. OTC stuff is not as proven and is not as good.

Dec 15, 2012 - 2:36am
If my triglycerides get any lower they'll be nonexistent. 12 total cholesterol.

Sorry to confound you with fact.

Dec 15, 2012 - 9:17am
JiM, whether fat or thin Type IV can be controlled by reducing CHO intake. When the IV therapists tell me that many of their patients' blood looks like Campbell's cream of tomato soup then you know there is a problem.

Agree with OIIIAI. Pronova didn't deveelop a patent protected process for heavy metal decontamination just to sell the stuff at a song.

Dec 15, 2012 - 1:07pm
OII--Here, I'm speaking from personal experience. I was dx'd type IV when I was in college, a sports guy, very active, lean/mean, low fat and sugar/no alch diet even then, etc. Still, the lowest fasting TG I ever reached was about 175--after a ten-hour run the day before (and no bananas, beer, or OJ!).

As I understand the lit., it is still unclear whether TGs are a biomarker or, in themselves, contribute to CAD. For obvious reasons, it's a question in which I have an interest.

Dec 15, 2012 - 1:10pm
BTW, still true with TCL of 150, HDL of 51, and LDL around 60, with great APOs, I'm told......

Eat a high protein/low carb/very low fat diet.

Dec 15, 2012 - 4:37pm
JiM, your non-HDL cholesterol is under 100 mg/dl. Don't know your family hx, but under ATP-III NCEP guidelines you are already 20 mg/dl below the target for non-HDL cholesterol even if you were in the highest risk strata (10 year risk for CHD greater than 20%). Just on the numbers alone would suggest good shape.

HOWEVER, having worked in this field, I can tell you that numbers notwithstanding, the most important risk factor for CHD is family hx.

Links to NCEP slide setss:

http://hp2010.nhlbihin.net/ncep_slds/menu.htm#1

Dec 15, 2012 - 5:41pm
Right. Too bad no tx for family hx.

Who knows, maybe it has been the TGs. Lots of CAD in the ancestors.

Dec 15, 2012 - 6:38pm
We all need to excercise more care in selecting our parents.
Dec 15, 2012 - 7:31pm
Indeed. I realized that in high school, but by then it was too late.
Dec 17, 2012 - 11:18am
This will be a blockbuster!
Dec 17, 2012 - 11:19am
FDA please issue your desicion
Dec 17, 2012 - 3:53pm
Fish oil doesn't do anything except that it gives you something to do, i.e., remeber to take another pill or two. Just eat a lot of fish. No, wait! That's not good advice either, there's a lot of mercury in fish certainly more than in those vaccines your afraid to get or give. Maybe just stick with those tried and true statins that Pfizer is being sued over by the government. No wait! There is a growing number of doctors who believe we're over doing it with statins and that they may be, overall, bad for health including sexual health ... oh boy, no one will be taking this stuff. Downer for the drug boys.
Dec 19, 2012 - 11:25am
blockbuster
Dec 19, 2012 - 11:25am
Buy out
Dec 19, 2012 - 11:26am
good trading range
Dec 19, 2012 - 11:27am
Looking for FDA news
Dec 19, 2012 - 11:27am
Go Positive!
Dec 20, 2012 - 9:29pm
Need news